References

Alexander MWashington DC: George Washington University; 2010

Ajjawi R Using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate how experienced practitioners learn to communicate clinical reasoning. The Qualitative Report. 2007; 12:(4)612-38

Baker JAustralia: University of Western Sydney; 2001

Bandman E, Bandman B An exploration of accident and emergency nurse experiences of triage decision-making in Hong Kong. Acc Emerg Nurs. 1988; 13:(4)206-13

Bendall J, Morrison A Clinical Judgement. In: O'Meara P, Grbich C (Eds). Sydney: Pearson Education; 2009

Benner P, Tanner C Clinical Judgement: how expert nurses use intuition. Am J Nurs. 1987; 87:(1)23-31

Boyle M, Smith E, Acher F Is mechanism of injury alone a useful predictor of major trauma?. Injury. 2008; 39:(9)986-92

Carnevali D, Thomas MPhiladelphia, PA: JB Lippincott; 1993

Caroline NSudbury: Jones & Bartlett; 2008

Cheney P, Haddock T, Sanchez L Safety and compliance with an emergency medical service direct psychiatric centre transport protocol. Am J Med. 2008; 26:(7)750-6

Cohen M, Omery A Schools of phenomenology: Implications for research. In: Morse JM (Ed). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994

Cohen M, Kahn D, Steeves R Hermeneutic Phenomenological Research.London: Sage Publications; 2000

Corcoran S Task complexity and nursing expertise as factors in nursing decision-making. Nursing Research. 1986; 35:(2)107-12

Crotty MLondon: Sage; 1998

Dahlberg K, Drew N, Nystrom M Reflective lifeworld research. 2001;

Studentlitteratur, Lund Daley B Learning and professional practice: a study of four professions. Adult Education Quarterly. 2001; 52:(1)39-48

Drury V, Francis F, Dulhunty G The Lived Experience of Rural Nurses. Online Journal of Rural Nursing and Health Care. 2005; 5:(1)19-27

Finlay L A dance between the reduction and reflexivity: explicating the ‘phenomenological psychological attitude’. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology. 2008; 39:(1)1-32

Gadamer HBerkeley: University of California Press; 1976

Gerrity P Perceptions in nursing: the value of intuition. Holistic Nursing Practice. 1987; 1:(3)64-71

Green J, Britten N Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. BMJ. 1998; 316:(7139)1230-2

Hammond K, McCelland G, Munpower JNew York: Hemisphere; 1980

Hammell K, Carpenter C, Dyck I Using qualitative research.London: Churchill Livingston; 2000

Heidegger MNew York: Harper and Row; 1962

Husserl LThe Hague: Martinus Nijhoff; 1964

Kalas M An artificial neural network for detection of biological early brain cancer. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2010; 1:(6)18-23

Kovacs G, Croskerry P Clinical decision-making: an emergency medicine perspective. Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6:(9)947-52

Loftus S, Higgs J Reconceptualising problem-based learning in a vygotskian framework. Focus on Health Professional Education. 2005; 7:(1)1-14

Loftus SAustralia: University of Sydney; 2006

Lord B Clinical reasoning in the health professions. JPEHPC. 2003; 1:(3-4)

Merleau-Ponty MLondon: Routledge; 1962

Montgomery KOxford: Oxford University Press; 2006

Rew L, Barrow E Intuition: A neglected hallmark of nursing knowledge. Adv Nurs Pract. 1987; 1:45-51

Roberts L, Henderson J Paramedics perceptions of their role, education, training and working relationships when attending cases of mental illness. JEPHC. 2009; 7:(3)

Roberts LAdelaide: Flinders University; 2009

Sandhu H, Carpenter C Clinical decision-making: opening the black box of cognitive reasoning. Ann Emerg Med. 2006; 48:(6)713-22

Sands N An exploration of clinical decision-making in mental health nursing. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2009; 23:(4)298-308

Sartre JLondon: Methuen; 1948

Saunders MSt Louis: Elsevier Mosby; 2005

Shaban R Accounting for assessments of mental illness in paramedic practice: A new theoretical framework. JEHPC. 2005; 3:(3)

Shaban R Paramedics clinical judgment and mental health assessments in emergency contexts: Research, practice and tools of the trade. JEHPC. 2006; 4:(2)

Smith A, Flower P, Larkin MLondon: Sage; 2009

Svenaeus FDordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2000

Tanner C, Benner P, Chelsa C Diagnostic reasoning strategies of nurses and nursing students. Nursing Research. 1987; 36:(6)358-63

Townsend R, Luck M Protective jurisdiction, patient autonomy and paramedics: the challenges of applying the NSW Mental Health Act. JEPHC. 2009; 7:(4)

1998. http//tinyurl.com/3qdokau ((accessed 2 September))

Wyatt A Paramedic practice-knowledge invested in Action. JEPHC. 2003; 1:(3-4)

Van Manen MFaber: Albany: State University of New York; 1990

Van Manen M Phenomenology of practice. Phenomenology & Practice. 2007; 1:(1)11-30

Wand T Duty of care in the emergency department. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing. 2004; 13:135-9

Yellowlees P Psychiatric assessment in community practice. The Medical Journal of Australia. 1998; 67:149-61

Paramedic clinical decision-making in mental health care: a new theoretical approach

05 December 2011
Volume 1 · Issue 2

Abstract

This article aims to present a new theoretical approach for examining paramedic clinical decision-making in relation to mental health care. Recent theorizing has begun exploring key clinical decision-making approaches that are particularly relevant to paramedic practice. These approaches have also revealed some important factors that influence clinical decision-making behaviours among paramedics such as prior experience and clinical and tacit knowledge. The literature, however, provides very little insight into the clinical decision-making strategies paramedics draw on and use when dealing with mental health patients, in particular, those patients who are dealt with under involuntary provisions of mental health legislation. In addition, the literature provides limited coverage to account for how paramedics deal with and mitigate risk factors relating to patients experiencing a mental health emergency. Following these shortcomings, this article will propose the use of hermeneutic phenomenological methods as a suitable and innovative interpretive research approach for examining paramedic clinical decision-making in relation to prehospital mental health care. It is argued that this approach is well suited for exploring how paramedics make sense of their experience providing emergency mental health care, how they perceive their role within the clinician-patient relationship, and the particular circumstances in which paramedics exercise their legislative responsibilities under mental health legislation.

Clinical decision-making can be thought of as a process of applying medical knowledge and skills to a clinical situation. In the prehospital environment, this process is a vital part of paramedic clinical life that often takes place in settings that are chaotic and unpredictable (Shaban, 2005). Lord (2003) purported that unlike controlled clinical settings (emergency departments and inpatient units), where clinicians have access to expert opinion, medical records and advanced diagnostic tests, the assessment and management of patients in the prehospital setting is usually characterized by independent and time critical factors and where access to similar support systems and medical technology is unavailable. In this context, the role of a paramedic is a complex one, centred on performing a range of assessments aimed at gathering, evaluating and synthesizing information that relates to a patient's presentation before deciding on appropriate treatment and transport decisions (Saunders, 2005; Caroline, 2008). Throughout this decision-making process, paramedics must continuously evaluate and decide the degree to which they are making the correct clinical decisions in relation to a particular patient.

Subscribe to get full access to International Paramedic Practice

Thank you for visiting International Paramedic Practice and reading our archive of expert clinical content. If you would like to read more from the only journal dedicated to those working in emergency care, you can start your subscription today for just £48.

What's included

  • CPD Focus

  • Develop your career

  • Stay informed