References

Acharya R, Badhu A, Shah T, Shrestha S. Availability of life support equipment and its utilization by ambulance drivers. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2017; 15:(2)182-186 https://doi.org/10.3126/jnhrc.v15i2.18197

Aluisio AR, Waheed S, Cameron P Clinical emergency care research in low-income and middle-income countries: opportunities and challenges. BMJ Glob Health. 2019; 4 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001289

Al-Shaqsi S. Models of international emergency medical service (EMS) Systems. Oman Med J. 2010; 25:(4)320-323 https://doi.org/10.5001/omj.2010.92

Aryal N, Regmi PR, van Teijlingen E, Simkhada P, Mahat P. Adolescents left behind by migrant workers: a call for community-based mental health interventions in Nepal. WHO South East Asia J Public Health. 2019; 8:(1)38-41 https://doi.org/10.4103/2224-3151.255348

JRCALC Clinical Guidelines. JRCALC Plus. Version 1.1.8.Bridgwater: Class Publishing; 2019

Bansal P, Khatiwada D, Upadhyay HP. Preventive practices of tuberculosis patients in a municipality of Chitwan District, Nepal. Journal of College of Medical Sciences-Nepal. 2019; 15:(1)59-66 https://doi.org/10.3126/jcmsn.v15i1.23165

Bhandari R, Sharma R. Epidemiology of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a descriptive study in the mid-western region of Nepal. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012; 7:253-257 https://doi.org/10.2147/COPD.S28602

Bhandari D, Yadav NK. Developing an integrated emergency medical services in a low-income country like Nepal: a concept paper. Int J Emerg Med. 2020; 13:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-020-0268-1

Dhakal KP. Road traffic accidents in Kathmandu Valley. Journal of Health Promotion. 2018; 6:37-44 https://doi.org/10.3126/jhp.v6i0.21802

Global burden of 87 risk factors in 204 countries and territories, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020a; 396:(10258)1223-1249 https://doi.org/0.1016/S0140-6736(20)30752-2

Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020b; 396:(10258)1204-1222 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9

Karkee R, Lee AH. Epidemiology of road traffic injuries in Nepal, 2001–2013: systematic review and secondary data analysis. BMJ Open. 2016; 6:(4) https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010757

Kosidou K, Magnusson C, Mittendorfer-Rutz E Recent time trends in levels of self-reported anxiety, mental health service use and suicidal behaviour in Stockholm. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2010; 122:(1)47-55 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.2009.01487.x

Larkin GL, Claassen CA, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA National study of ambulance transports to United States emergency departments: importance of mental health problems. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006; 21:(2)82-90 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X0000340X

Lauber C, Rössler W. Stigma towards people with mental illness in developing countries in Asia. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2007; 19:(2)157-178 https://doi.org/10.1080/09540260701278903

Nepal Ambulance Service. Home page. 2021. http//nepalambulanceservice.org (accessed 11 June 2021)

Pandey NR. Emergency medicine in Nepal: present practice and direction for future. Int J Emerg Med. 2016; 9:(1) https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-016-0118-3

Pape-Köhler CI, Simanski C, Nienaber U, Lefering R. External factors and the incidence of severe trauma: time, date, season and moon. Injury. 2014; 45:S93-S99 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2014.08.027

Roggenkamp R, Andrew E, Nehme Z, Cox S, Smith K. Descriptive analysis of mental health-related presentations to emergency medical services. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018; 22:(4)399-405 https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2017.1399181

Saud B, Paudel G. The threat of ambient air pollution in Kathmandu, Nepal. J Environ Public Health. 2018; 2018 https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1504591

Shrestha N, Mehata S, Pradhan PMS, Joshi D, Mishra SR. A nationally representative study on socio-demographic and geographic correlates, and trends in tobacco use in Nepal. Sci Rep. 2019; 9:(1) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-39635-y

Sloan C, Moore ML, Hartert T. Impact of pollution, climate, and sociodemographic factors on spatiotemporal dynamics of seasonal respiratory viruses. Clin Transl Sci. 2011; 4:(1)48-54 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2010.00257.x

Roslee NLB, Goh YS. Young adult's perception towards the formation of stigma on people experiencing mental health conditions: a descriptive qualitative study. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021; 30:(1)148-157 https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12766

Walker R, Auerbach PS, Kelley BV, Gongal R, Amsalem D, Mahadevan S. Implementing an emergency medical services system in Kathmandu, Nepal: a model for ‘white coat diplomacy’. Wilderness Environ Med. 2014; 25:(3)311-318 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wem.2014.04.006

World Health Organization. A year without precedent: WHO's COVID-19 response. 2021. https//tinyurl.com/5vhvfn7n (accessed 27 May 2021)

A review of cases received by the Nepal Ambulance Service over one year

02 June 2021
Volume 11 · Issue 2

Abstract

Nepal Ambulance Service (NAS) callout data was examined to aid future research into Nepali prehospital care, and identify trends and areas within NAS that may benefit from further training. A retrospective search was carried out of the NAS covering of the calls received and attended by NAS covering a period of 12 months. A total of 5486 cases from the NAS database were included. The data showed there had been a rise in NAS cases over the 12-month period, with 152 more cases being logged in July 2019 than in August 2018, an overall increase of 38.48%. The rise is fairly uniform and consistent month-on-month, except for February 2019, when there was an unexplained reduction. This rise is fairly uniform and consistent, except for February 2019, when there was an unexplained reduction. Respiratory and trauma were the most numerous types of case. The increase in cases is most likely because NAS is growing in popularity. Based on the findings of this paper, it would seem that NAS is set to continue its upward trajectory of callouts. Further research on this service is warranted.

This paper aims to provide data from callouts to Nepal Ambulance Service (NAS) to aid future research into Nepali prehospital care, and identify any trends and areas within NAS that may benefit from further training within NAS. To meet the aims, NAS callout data from a 12-month period was collected and analysed.

NAS uses trained emergency medical technicians (EMTs) to lead ambulance-based care. NAS is a non-profit organisation dedicated to providing first-class care to Nepalese people of all backgrounds.

Throughout the world, patients with life-threatening conditions depend on the timeliness and skill of prehospital clinicians to help prevent avoidable mortality/morbidity. Al-Shaqsi (2010) says any emergency medical service (EMS) is ‘an integral part of any effective and functional health care system’. The same is true in Nepal.

Historically, prehospital care in Nepal has been minimal and underdeveloped (Pandey, 2016). The literature on Nepali prehospital care is limited, as it is on many other countries of similar socioeconomic status (Aluisio et al, 2019). Ambulance services exist but there are no formal national regulations governing them (Bhandari, 2020). A study in 2017 of the eastern Nepal region found the fewer than a quarter stocked adequate emergency medical equipment, and more than half of staff had no basic first aid training (Acharya et al, 2017). Because of this, many private ambulances provide only transport.

Since its establishment in 2011, NAS has strived to improve this through providing emergency care with trained staff to local communities across several areas of Nepal.

NAS now employs many staff, including EMTs, pilots, physicians, call takers/dispatchers, administrators and managers. The dispatch centre is in central Kathmandu and operates ambulance stations at seven locations in Pokhara, Chitwan and Butwal, as well as four in Kathmandu. Operating from these areas allows NAS to see and treat a plethora of people and transport patients between hospitals.

Methodology

A retrospective hand search of the NAS database, which holds a digital record of the calls received and attended by NAS, was carried out.

Permission was sought from the medical director for NAS to acquire the anonymised data from the NAS computer system for research purposes. The data collected by the authors does not breach the privacy people using NAS. NAS is a teaching and learning institute and service users understand that the data collected may be used for teaching and learning as well as for research purposes.

All recorded cases attended by NAS from 1 August 2018 to 31 July 2019 (12 months) were included in the search.

Cases were first divided into either primary or secondary categories. Primary cases involved service users contacting NAS from within the community and NAS staff were the first formal practitioners in attendance. Secondary cases were hospital-to-hospital transfers.

Cases were then subcategorised according to the chief presenting complaint as documented on the NAS database. Key words were used as inclusion criteria to match NAS chief complaints (Joint Royal Colleges Ambulance Liaison Committee, Association of Ambulance Chief Executives, 2019) to a set medical category (Table 1). Chief complaints that did not meet inclusion criteria were excluded from the overall case total.


Chief complaint category Key words
Cardiovascular Cardiac arrestAcute coronary syndromeChest painAcute heart failureAbdominal aortic aneurysmHypertensive emergencyHeart/cardiac problem Cardiac arrhythmiaPalpitationsSyncope/near syncopeDisorder of implantable defibrillatorHypotensionShock
Respiratory Respiratory arrestObstruction of airway by foreign bodyAcute asthmaDyspnoeaShortness of breathRespiratory tract infectionHaemoptysisAcute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Pulmonary embolismSpontaneous pneumothoraxNontraumatic haemothoraxPneumoniaBronchitisBronchiolitisDry coughProductive coughLung cancerPulmonary oedema
Neurological Transient ischaemic attackUnconsciousHeadacheDisorder of gait and/or balanceAcute confusionMigraineAcute meningitisIntracranial haemorrhage Parkinson's diseaseNeuralgiaParaesthesiaDizzinessDysphasiaBrain tumour/cancerParalysisWeaknessCerebral vascular attack (stroke)Seizure
Ear, nose and throat (ENT)/oral Bleeding from nosePain in throatForeign body in pharynxTonsillitisDisorder of tongueDental disorder EpiglottitisDysphagiaMumpsBleeding from mouthENT/oral problemENT cancer (various)Oesophageal varices
Eyes Retained foreign body in eyeVisual disturbanceEye infection Pain in eyeAcute conjunctivitisInjury of eyeEye problem
Gastrointestinal Abdominal painUpper gastrointestinal haemorrhageIngestion of foreign materialLower gastrointestinal haemorrhagePoisoningGastroenteritisAcute pancreatitisAcute cholecystitisLiver problemsPeptic ulcer VomitingDiarrhoeaConstipationRectal haemorrhageAcute appendicitisIntestinal obstructionDiverticulitis (morphologic abnormality)HaemorrhoidsHerniaGastritisAccidental drug overdoseBowel cancerNausea
Skin Minor woundAnimal bite woundHuman bite woundExposure to sting or bite by insectCellulitisAbrasion Infection of skin and/or subcutaneoustissueLaceration injuryBurnLocal infection of woundBlanching rashPressure ulcersHaematoma
Non-traumatic musculoskeletal Backache/back painHip painCauda equina syndromeTendinitisKnee painShoulder painHand painPain in wristJoint pain Ankle painNeck painJaw painPain in elbowPain in armPain in lower limbFoot painSciaticaChronic pain
Genitourinary Urinary tract infectious diseaseGenital injuryDysuriaBlood in urineDisorder of urethral catheter Disorder of menstruationBleeding from vaginaAcute kidney injuryKidney problemsAcute nephritisRetention of urine
Pregnancy & Labour Postpartum haemorrhageAntepartum haemorrhageMiscarriageBirth/delivery of childDisorder of pregnancy Resuscitation of neonate (procedure)Pre-eclampsiaEclamptic seizureLabour painEctopic pregnancy
Endocrine, systemic and infection AnaphylaxisAllergic reactionHypo/HyperglycaemiaSepsisHypothermiaMalaisePyrexia of unknown originNeutropenic sepsisAnaemia JaundiceHeat exhaustion/heat strokeIllness unspecifiedCancer unspecifiedInfection unspecifiedHypo/hyperthyroidismInfluenzaAcute adrenal insufficiencyDehydration
Trauma Major traumaAssaultAbdominal injuryPelvic injuryChest injuryTraumatic amputationInjury caused by electrical exposureTraumatic pneumothoraxTraumatic haemothoraxCrushing injuryTraumatic injury of spinal cord and/or vertebral columnRoad traffic collision/accidentSexual assault Fracture of ribFracture of neck of femurKnee injuryShoulder regionElbow injuryHand injuryWrist injuryAnkle injuryNeck injuryJaw injuryHead injuryDislocation (morphologic abnormality)Fracture of upper limbFracture of lower limbNonfatal submersionDrowning
Mental health Psychotic disorderSuicide attemptAnxiety attackDepressive disorder Delusions/hallucinationsAcute behavioural disorderIntentional self-harmMental disorderSuicidal thoughts
Substance misuse Alcohol intoxication Intoxication caused by recreational drug misuse
Altitude sickness Altitude sickness

Seventy-four cases were excluded from the study for the following reasons:

  • Unspecified chief presenting complaint
  • Names (e.g. referring doctor) given as chief presenting complaint
  • Multiple possible categorisations.
  • Results

    A total of 5486 cases were sourced in the NAS database using the above methodology and included in this study. The results are shown in the online appendix under the following headings:

  • Table 2 : Full results—condition category, whether the call was primary or secondary, and the month when the call took place
  • Figure 1 : Number of cases in each month
  • Figure 2 : Comparison of primary and secondary cases for each complaint category
  • Table 3 : Total number of patients in each category in descending order with the corresponding percentages
  • Figure 3 : Top six medical categories with primary and secondary cases combined the year.

  • Month
    Conditions Primary or Secondary Aug-18 Sep-18 Oct-18 Nov-18 Dec-18 Jan-19 Feb-19 Mar-19 Apr-19 May-19 Jun-19 Jul-19
    Cardio Primary 23 24 29 13 18 24 13 21 10 28 16 31
    Cardio Secondary 31 32 39 26 35 45 30 44 45 41 37 72
    Respiratory Primary 15 37 30 34 34 40 52 63 48 60 37 32
    Respiratory Secondary 32 39 33 32 38 55 68 53 51 48 62 66
    Neurological Primary 29 30 23 19 26 31 20 45 41 40 29 33
    Neurological Secondary 20 18 34 30 39 33 19 48 31 34 29 43
    ENT/Oral Primary 4 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 4 3 0 2
    ENT/Oral Secondary 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
    Eyes Primary 0 2 1 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
    Eyes Secondary 0 0 2 1 0 5 0 2 2 0 0 0
    Gastrointestinal (GI) Primary 34 46 32 38 15 21 28 55 45 38 38 44
    Gastrointestinal (GI) Secondary 24 8 21 21 18 19 17 26 28 23 31 35
    Skin Primary 5 1 1 6 1 6 2 4 2 1 1 2
    Skin Secondary 1 5 1 3 3 7 4 0 4 2 5 2
    MSK (Non-Trauma) Primary 5 11 4 13 6 8 6 2 3 7 7 9
    MSK (Non-Trauma) Secondary 1 0 1 5 4 3 2 2 0 1 2 5
    Genitourinary Primary 13 11 9 15 6 10 9 7 20 10 6 10
    Genitourinary Secondary 4 3 6 8 12 8 4 5 15 18 7 9
    Pregnancy and Labour Primary 24 31 24 29 28 11 15 16 22 9 14 27
    Pregnancy and Labour Secondary 8 3 8 7 3 2 5 2 4 3 4 5
    Endo/Systemic illness/Infection Primary 30 30 32 18 26 27 17 20 15 25 31 19
    Endo/Systemic illness/Infection Secondary 14 20 11 12 8 16 6 11 18 16 17 25
    Trauma Primary 33 44 48 49 47 43 29 50 64 62 55 36
    Trauma Secondary 32 37w 33 30 48 28 31 37 33 29 39 39
    MH Primary 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 0
    MH Secondary 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0
    Substance misuse Primary 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
    Substance misuse Secondary 5 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0
    Altitude sickness Primary 6 1 6 12 2 0 0 2 9 4 0 0
    Altitude sickness Secondary 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    Total 395 437 430 425 420 443 380 517 516 507 469 547
    Figure 1. Number of cases in each month
    Figure 2. Comparison of primary and secondary calls in each condition category

    Chief complaint category Total number (%)
    Respiratory 1059 (19.30%)
    Trauma 976 (17.79%)
    Neurological 744 (13.56%)
    Cardiovascular 727 (13.25%)
    Gastrointestinal 705 (12.85%)
    Endocrine, systemic and infection 464 (08.46%)
    Pregnancy and labour 304 (05.54%)
    Genitourinary 225 (04.10%)
    Musculoskeletal non-traumatic 107 (01.95%)
    Skin 69 (01.26%)
    Altitude sickness 42 (00.77%)
    Ear, nose and throat/oral 19 (00.35%)
    Eyes 19 (00.35%)
    Substance misuse 16 (00.29%)
    Mental health 10 (00.18%)
    Figure 3. Top six medical categories with primary and secondary cases combined over the year

    Analysis and discussion

    Overarching trend

    The first observation that can be made from the results is that there is a general upward trend of NAS cases numbers throughout the trial months. In July 2019, 152 more cases were logged than in August 2018, an overall increase of 38.48%. This increase is fairly uniform and consistent month-on-month, except for in February 2019, which displays an unexplained reduction.

    In 2013, NAS was dispatching a mean of nine ambulance responses daily (Walker et al, 2014). The NAS database shows that this number had risen to an average of 15 EMT ambulance responses per day within our study period. This increase could be a result of greater public awareness and the growing reputation of NAS.

    It could be argued that a general increase in illness among the Nepali population from an unknown source could have caused the increase in patients treated by NAS. However, this seems unlikely as most medical categories increase uniformly rather than systemic illness only.

    Primary versus secondary cases

    Primary cases (2946) accounted for 53.7% of cases and secondary cases (2540) accounted for 46.3%, a difference of 7.4 percentage points. This shows that NAS is used at similar levels for primary and secondary cases. The reason for this is unclear, as is the reason why slightly more primary than secondary cases are seen.

    Overall largest category

    In primary and secondary cases combined, patients complaining of respiratory problems are the most numerous. The data from this study alone are inadequate to make any categorical judgment as to the cause.

    However, it is likely that the high levels of air pollution in the Kathmandu valley have contributed to the number of respiratory complaints (Saud and Paudel, 2018). It is also possible that high levels of smoking tobacco in Nepal (Shrestha et al, 2019) have contributed.

    Respectively, air quality and tobacco use have remained the second and third highest risk factors for disease in Nepal from 2009 to 2019 (GBD 2019 Diseases and Injuries Collaborators (GBD), 2020a). This systemic analysis also found that, in 2019, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) was the leading cause of death and disability in Nepal (GBD 2020b).

    This is not the case for many countries with a similar socioeconomic status, such Rwanda where COPD is the 14th highest cause. Even in neighbouring India, COPD is the third biggest cause of death and disability (GBD, 2020b).

    The presence of other respiratory conditions in Nepal such as tuberculosis should also be taken into account as they can also lead to COPD (Bansal et al, 2019).

    Largest primary category

    Over the data collection period, the most common reason for a primary case was trauma. Given the nature of physical trauma, often being debilitating and sudden, patients often cannot get to hospital other than by ambulance. Poor road conditions, negligent drivers and an increase in vehicles on the road all may contribute to the growing number of patients experiencing trauma in Nepal (Karkee and Lee, 2016).

    In their 2001-2013 epidemiology of road traffic injuries (RTI) in Nepal, Karkee and Lee (2016) report Kathmandu Valley has a higher RTI rate yet fewer mortalities than the rest of the country. Dhakal (2018) also reports that the mortality rate is lower in the capital than in other parts of Nepal. Dhakal (2018) also reports a decrease in mortality rate in the capital in comparison with other parts of Nepal.

    Given that four ambulance stations are based in Kathmandu, it is possible that NAS has contributed to the improved survival rates in recent years.

    Smallest category

    Mental health cases were found to be the least common presenting complaint during the study period, with just 10 cases. This is very different from Western culture, where mental health problems are widely acknowledged (Kosidou et al, 2010) and are frequently attended by emergency services (Larkin et al, 2006; Roggenkamp et al, 2018).

    The low number of mental health cases could be because of a lack of awareness of mental health issues or a strong taboo against such conditions (Lauber and Rössler, 2007; Aryal et al, 2019; Roslee and Goh, 2021) describe an overwhelming stigma and prevalent discrimination towards mental illness in Asia. They report that patients prefer alternative treatment and management such as a spiritual, supernatural or magical approach. These could account for the low numbers of people with mental health issues using NAS.

    Seasonal trends

    During the colder months in Nepal, the collective data shows a peak in respiratory cases. This could be because cold weather is known to exacerbate COPD (Bhandari and Sharma, 2012). Seasonal respiratory viruses such as influenza or respiratory syncytial virus (Sloan et al, 2011) may also play a part.

    In contrast, trauma cases appear to decrease slightly around the same colder period. This is somewhat similar to a 9-year study in Germany by Pape-Köhler et al (2014), who found trauma to be lowest during the cold period between Christmas and the new year.

    The monsoon season (June-August) did not appear to produce any obvious pattern in the data. There is, however, a peak in secondary cardiovascular cases in July 2019 of which the cause is unclear.

    Recommendations

    The authors have several recommendations for further research.

    Patients should be surveyed on why are they are not are not using NAS services. Addressing this would create opportunities to make the service more patient centred. This could increase call volume to NAS.

    Statistical data on treatments provided by NAS during callouts could be analysed to improve care.

    Whether a service like NAS would be feasible on a national level could be examined.

    This study collected data just months before the COVID-19 global pandemic (World Health Organization, 2021). Analysis of data on the caseload of NAS in a post-COVID-19 Nepal could offer a fascinating insight into how COVID-19 has affected NAS and the Nepali community.

    Limitations

    There are several limitations to this study.

    First, all the data were sourced from the NAS database in Nepal. Data input for this resource was done by hand, and the information was extrapolated from the database for this study also by hand, so the data are subject to human error.

    In addition to the potential for human error, some case documentation on the NAS database was ambiguous and, unfortunately, could not be categorised.

    Moreover, the researchers noticed that several patients had duplicate records created by administrative staff on the database. The reason for this assumed to be because some cases started as primary and then became secondary when the patient was moved to another hospital. This means that one patient could possibly account for two callouts.

    Further to this, some callouts were listed as primary when the location of the call out was a hospital, raising the possibility that some secondary cases were inadvertently labelled as primary.

    These potential flaws were not taken into consideration when calculating the total number of patients NAS saw within the 12 months studied.

    Additionally, some patients may fall into more than one category. The reality of patient care is complex and diverse. For example, mental health issues may present with a chief complaint of poisoning, intoxication or even trauma, if the patient had self-harmed. However, using this study's methodology, these patients would be categorised as GI or trauma instead of mental health cases.

    Finally, accessible literature around Nepali prehospital care was extremely limited at the time of writing so in-depth comparison to previous findings was not possible within this analysis.

    Conclusion

    This study found a rise overall in total cases treated by NAS within a 12-month period, with respiratory and trauma cases being having the highest numbers. This rise in cases is most likely because NAS is growing more popular within Nepal.

    Based on the findings of this paper, it would seem that NAS is set to continue its upward trajectory of callouts. Further research on this service is warranted.

    Key points

  • The literature on Nepali prehospital care is limited
  • Ambulance services within Nepal exist, but there are no formal national regulations governing them
  • Calls to the Nepal Ambulance Service (NAS) appeared to be increasing over the 12 months studied
  • NAS was called most commonly because of a respiratory problems
  • Trauma was the most common reason for NAS to attend a patient prehospitally
  • CPD Reflection Questions

  • What is the significance of the increase in Nepal Ambulance Service (NAS) call volume?
  • How can the data regarding types of ailments NAS encounters be used to benefit further training within NAS?
  • What could be done to encourage the people of Nepal to use an ambulance service rather than make their own way to hospital?